lichess.org
Donate

A Transitional Phase between Technical and Tactical Positions

@felew699 said ^

Comments on https://lichess.org/@/felew699/blog/a-transitional-phase-between-technical-and-tactical-positions/kcu6DgFh

your blog was truly nice
it shows the actual difference between technical and tactical positions

@felew699 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/28h11Ln5) > Comments on https://lichess.org/@/felew699/blog/a-transitional-phase-between-technical-and-tactical-positions/kcu6DgFh your blog was truly nice it shows the actual difference between technical and tactical positions

Very beneficial thoughts has been written to help aspiring players.

Very beneficial thoughts has been written to help aspiring players.

"Technical" and tactical? Why do people keep on inventing new names for things that already exist?

"Technical" and tactical? Why do people keep on inventing new names for things that already exist?

@IaIaCthulhuFhtagn said ^

"Technical" and tactical? Why do people keep on inventing new names for things that already exist?

Good for you that you know that it already existed. As I have said in my earlier blog posts, some of this knowledge comes from books like Excelling at Chess and Strategic Play - School of Chess Excellence. Technical and Tactical are not new names for things that already exist; they are the names used by the authors of the above books. I am just compiling this knowledge here into something easier to digest. According to my knowledge, a formal classification was never done, and they had not talked about a transitional phase. Further, the definitions of a critical position also differ widely, so this is just my perspective. You are free to take in what you like and reject what you don't.

@IaIaCthulhuFhtagn said [^](/forum/redirect/post/WeEGjIZZ) > "Technical" and tactical? Why do people keep on inventing new names for things that already exist? Good for you that you know that it already existed. As I have said in my earlier blog posts, some of this knowledge comes from books like Excelling at Chess and Strategic Play - School of Chess Excellence. Technical and Tactical are not new names for things that already exist; they are the names used by the authors of the above books. I am just compiling this knowledge here into something easier to digest. According to my knowledge, a formal classification was never done, and they had not talked about a transitional phase. Further, the definitions of a critical position also differ widely, so this is just my perspective. You are free to take in what you like and reject what you don't.

Pawn breaks
Infiltration
Simplification
Sacrifice

Or, in short: P.I...

ah. so that's why you combined "Simplification" and "Sacrifice"...

Pawn breaks Infiltration Simplification Sacrifice Or, in short: P.I... ah. so that's why you combined "Simplification" and "Sacrifice"...

@DominateMe said ^

Pawn breaks
Infiltration
Simplification
Sacrifice

Or, in short: P.I...

ah. so that's why you combined "Simplification" and "Sacrifice"...

Oh my GOODNESS @Dominateme, you had to notice that just by reading the thing when I didn't even care to look at it in short form (I combined simplification and sacrifice because they are different aspects of basically the same thing). Very attentive to details, aren't you? It is awesome, but at the same time, now I am thinking of changing the wording

@DominateMe said [^](/forum/redirect/post/5mG0qDiW) > Pawn breaks > Infiltration > Simplification > Sacrifice > > Or, in short: P.I... > > ah. so that's why you combined "Simplification" and "Sacrifice"... Oh my GOODNESS @Dominateme, you had to notice that just by reading the thing when I didn't even care to look at it in short form (I combined simplification and sacrifice because they are different aspects of basically the same thing). Very attentive to details, aren't you? It is awesome, but at the same time, now I am thinking of changing the wording

Why are you using stolen art assets for your image? (Utilizing A.I. is using stolen assets).

Why are you using stolen art assets for your image? (Utilizing A.I. is using stolen assets).

@Finallock said ^

Why are you using stolen art assets for your image? (Utilizing A.I. is using stolen assets).

Thank you for letting me know about this @Finallock. I didn't think it was illegal because I never used AI to write the post itself. I created a forum just to be sure about this. If a moderator says that this is not right, then I am willing to change the title images of all the posts in which I have used AI images.

@Finallock said [^](/forum/redirect/post/WkaIAdz5) > Why are you using stolen art assets for your image? (Utilizing A.I. is using stolen assets). Thank you for letting me know about this @Finallock. I didn't think it was illegal because I never used AI to write the post itself. I created a forum just to be sure about this. If a moderator says that this is not right, then I am willing to change the title images of all the posts in which I have used AI images.

@felew699 said ^

Why are you using stolen art assets for your image? (Utilizing A.I. is using stolen assets).

Thank you for letting me know about this @Finallock. I didn't think it was illegal because I never used AI to write the post itself. I created a forum just to be sure about this. If a moderator says that this is not right, then I am willing to change the title images of all the posts in which I have used AI images.

If your original thoughts are important enough to not use A.I. for your post then why isn't artwork worth the same consideration?

I'm assuming you would not want an A.I. to replace yourself or anyone else when it comes to posting articles like this. I would keep this in mind when thinking about utilizing A.I. to generate artwork / graphics.

@felew699 said [^](/forum/redirect/post/aNUbbrsw) > > Why are you using stolen art assets for your image? (Utilizing A.I. is using stolen assets). > > Thank you for letting me know about this @Finallock. I didn't think it was illegal because I never used AI to write the post itself. I created a forum just to be sure about this. If a moderator says that this is not right, then I am willing to change the title images of all the posts in which I have used AI images. If your original thoughts are important enough to not use A.I. for your post then why isn't artwork worth the same consideration? I'm assuming you would not want an A.I. to replace yourself or anyone else when it comes to posting articles like this. I would keep this in mind when thinking about utilizing A.I. to generate artwork / graphics.