Amazing Tiebreaks between Magnus & Erigaisi to decide the Champion

Comments on https://lichess.org/@/buendiachess/blog/amazing-tiebreaks-between-magnus--erigaisi-to-decide-the-champion/ZWWNqbhd

maimoun

Thank you for sharing this article. It appeared on my home page, and I would like to offer some constructive feedback after reading it:

Clarifying the conclusion: The ending is slightly confusing. It states that Magnus won, but the final congratulations are directed toward Erigaisi, which leaves the actual outcome a bit unclear.
Proofreading: There are a few typographical errors throughout the text ('Sweeden', 'rooster', 'analiced' ect.). A quick review would greatly enhance the article's professional feel.
Expanding the analysis: The chess commentary could benefit from more depth. Brief explanations for statements like 'the queen is bad here' or 'careless move' would make the analysis much more helpful to readers.
Improving readability: The presentation of the tiebreak rules, game flow, and player names is somewhat difficult to follow. A more consistent structure would improve the reading experience.
Overall, the article conveys a lot of enthusiasm, but balancing that energy with a bit more structural detail and technical substance would make it a much stronger report.

Thank you for sharing this article. It appeared on my home page, and I would like to offer some constructive feedback after reading it: - **Clarifying the conclusion**: The ending is slightly confusing. It states that Magnus won, but the final congratulations are directed toward Erigaisi, which leaves the actual outcome a bit unclear. - **Proofreading**: There are a few typographical errors throughout the text ('Sweeden', 'rooster', 'analiced' ect.). A quick review would greatly enhance the article's professional feel. - **Expanding the analysis**: The chess commentary could benefit from more depth. Brief explanations for statements like 'the queen is bad here' or 'careless move' would make the analysis much more helpful to readers. - **Improving readability**: The presentation of the tiebreak rules, game flow, and player names is somewhat difficult to follow. A more consistent structure would improve the reading experience. Overall, the article conveys a lot of enthusiasm, but balancing that energy with a bit more structural detail and technical substance would make it a much stronger report.

righin

It is a good article but please could you reference the players' full name in the first instance, eg. Arjun Erigaisi, not just Erigaisi.

It makes it a bit easier to read and follow things :)

It is a good article but please could you reference the players' full name in the first instance, eg. Arjun Erigaisi, not just Erigaisi. It makes it a bit easier to read and follow things :)

ICOOKATCHESS1