Comments on https://lichess.org/@/jk_182/blog/norway-chess-2024-in-graphs/9L0baZYp
When it showed the graph I think the first one I thought Carlson world have no inaccuracies at all but I can tell Ding did worse.I hope Ding does better next time.
When it showed the graph I think the first one I thought Carlson world have no inaccuracies at all but I can tell Ding did worse.I hope Ding does better next time.
I have a couple questions - number one, how do you quantify "better" vs. "won", or "sharpness?" These are all really interesting - well done.
I have a couple questions - number one, how do you quantify "better" vs. "won", or "sharpness?" These are all really interesting - well done.
@KoolAidMan2019 said in #3:
I have a couple questions - number one, how do you quantify "better" vs. "won", or "sharpness?" These are all really interesting - well done.
Better is a Stockfish evaluation of more than +1 and with won games I mean the result of the game. And sharpness is calculated using the WDL of Leela Chess Zero, you can read more about it here: https://chessenginelab.substack.com/p/evaluating-sharpness-using-lc0s-wdl
@KoolAidMan2019 said in #3:
> I have a couple questions - number one, how do you quantify "better" vs. "won", or "sharpness?" These are all really interesting - well done.
Better is a Stockfish evaluation of more than +1 and with won games I mean the result of the game. And sharpness is calculated using the WDL of Leela Chess Zero, you can read more about it here: https://chessenginelab.substack.com/p/evaluating-sharpness-using-lc0s-wdl
haha
haha
Wow. Great
Wow. Great
qf7
qf7


