Comments on https://lichess.org/@/chessmindai/blog/how-to-reach-1800-part-1/6lc2gZWN
An instructive blog, but I disagree with
"Even a +2 or -2 position can be turned around (without anyone blundering)"
A +2 or -2 ends in a win when both play perfectly. To turn it around the winning side must blunder. You cannot gradually improve a lost position or gradually degrade a winning position. There is one tipping point, i.e. blunder where the win is gone.
An instructive blog, but I disagree with
"Even a +2 or -2 position can be turned around (without anyone blundering)"
A +2 or -2 ends in a win when both play perfectly. To turn it around the winning side must blunder. You cannot gradually improve a lost position or gradually degrade a winning position. There is one tipping point, i.e. blunder where the win is gone.
@tpr said in #2:
An instructive blog, but I disagree with
"Even a +2 or -2 position can be turned around (without anyone blundering)"
A +2 or -2 ends in a win when both play perfectly. To turn it around the winning side must blunder. You cannot gradually improve a lost position or gradually degrade a winning position. There is one tipping point, i.e. blunder where the win is gone.
nope, inaccurate play is enough, a full blunder isnt required
@tpr said in #2:
> An instructive blog, but I disagree with
> "Even a +2 or -2 position can be turned around (without anyone blundering)"
> A +2 or -2 ends in a win when both play perfectly. To turn it around the winning side must blunder. You cannot gradually improve a lost position or gradually degrade a winning position. There is one tipping point, i.e. blunder where the win is gone.
nope, inaccurate play is enough, a full blunder isnt required
Nope, +2 is a win. You need a blunder to lose that.
Nope, +2 is a win. You need a blunder to lose that.
