it says it's your analytics among 10000+ games, but I have them like 20000+ , so are there 10000 the last of 20000 or not? if not , then ot's bad, because I want fresh Analytics, excluding old games, I have fallen in rating recently , but Accuracy or Centipawn loss haven't much changed there, is that as it should be, due some other reasons, or because there are too many games, including old ones, or something else?
Well in the "Some of the games used to generate this insight", you can see there are very recent games.
They could have a date filter in all the slices offered. How many fields can they combine behind the front scene of the displayed slice?
using concise and expressive words in my finite lexicon... :).. data visualization slice= spoiler.
Good old variable size Boolean library searches applied to filters anywhere, e.g. on more than one lichess search features. Parole de dinosaure having been there and done that a with satisfying interactive time scale results about the accordingly more appropriate insightful contents.
slight tangent similar, piling up question.
I say, do that with puzzle feedback too. oops.. already there but time scale is 3 months.. Is there a scale issue? in either? (main and tangent).
PS: op. sorry for this related sub question. I thought I would save some vertical space. 2 threads in one.. kidding.. but thanks in advance.
I think a sliding lower bound and upper bound date filter (or game #, where # is ordered chronologically with game start date).
That way even correspondance games can be controlled (for they have duration over days). Or end date (full date).
omg nice
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.