<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xml:lang="en-US" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"><id>https://lichess.org/@/D2D4C2C4/blog</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lichess.org/@/D2D4C2C4/blog" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://lichess.org/@/D2D4C2C4/blog.atom" /><title>D2D4C2C4's Blog</title><updated>2024-10-18T08:42:24.548Z</updated><entry><id>https://lichess.org/@/D2D4C2C4/blog/why-opening-statistics-are-hard/9g61F9Uc</id><published>2024-10-18T08:42:24.548Z</published><updated>2024-10-18T08:42:24.548Z</updated><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lichess.org/@/D2D4C2C4/blog/why-opening-statistics-are-hard/9g61F9Uc" /><title>Why Opening Statistics Are Hard</title><category term="Opening" label="Opening" scheme="https://lichess.org/blog/topic/Opening"></category><category term="Chess" label="Chess" scheme="https://lichess.org/blog/topic/Chess"></category><category term="Lichess" label="Lichess" scheme="https://lichess.org/blog/topic/Lichess"></category><content type="html">&lt;img class=&quot;ublog-post-image&quot; width=&quot;880&quot; height=&quot;550&quot; src=&quot;https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&amp;amp;h=550&amp;amp;op=thumbnail&amp;amp;path=d2d4c2c4:ublog:9g61F9Uc:NlRhGdr0.png&amp;amp;w=880&amp;amp;sig=91f04d99b4a588029f42b2ac5b2585485c345c0d&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;TL;DR There are pros and cons to adjusting opening statistics by players’ ratings. Under certain conditions, the two types of estimates are virtually identical. Statistics on the very first few moves should be completely disregarded regardless of the method used.</content><media:thumbnail url="https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&amp;h=550&amp;op=thumbnail&amp;path=d2d4c2c4:ublog:9g61F9Uc:NlRhGdr0.png&amp;w=880&amp;sig=91f04d99b4a588029f42b2ac5b2585485c345c0d"></media:thumbnail><author><name>D2D4C2C4</name></author></entry><entry><id>https://lichess.org/@/D2D4C2C4/blog/why-opening-statistics-are-wrong/VKNZ1oKw</id><published>2024-09-24T15:52:47.969Z</published><updated>2024-09-24T15:52:47.969Z</updated><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://lichess.org/@/D2D4C2C4/blog/why-opening-statistics-are-wrong/VKNZ1oKw" /><title>Why Opening Statistics Are Wrong</title><category term="Opening" label="Opening" scheme="https://lichess.org/blog/topic/Opening"></category><category term="Chess" label="Chess" scheme="https://lichess.org/blog/topic/Chess"></category><category term="Lichess" label="Lichess" scheme="https://lichess.org/blog/topic/Lichess"></category><content type="html">&lt;img class=&quot;ublog-post-image&quot; width=&quot;880&quot; height=&quot;550&quot; alt=&quot;First-move statistics&quot; src=&quot;https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&amp;amp;h=550&amp;amp;op=thumbnail&amp;amp;path=d2d4c2c4:ublog:VKNZ1oKw:Gfe01g0T.png&amp;amp;w=880&amp;amp;sig=c10e5fe6d8013b3a50f9359cb683d13a254d7e7d&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Opening statistics, such as those in the opening explorer have a methodological flaw. They tend to significantly overstate differences in win rates among various possible opening moves. I propose an alternative methodology and present some data to compare the two calculation methods.</content><media:thumbnail url="https://image.lichess1.org/display?fmt=png&amp;h=550&amp;op=thumbnail&amp;path=d2d4c2c4:ublog:VKNZ1oKw:Gfe01g0T.png&amp;w=880&amp;sig=c10e5fe6d8013b3a50f9359cb683d13a254d7e7d"></media:thumbnail><author><name>D2D4C2C4</name></author></entry></feed>