lichess.org
Donate

Turning Small Advantages into Crushing Wins

Winning without heroics You don’t need a sacrifice to win a good position. Most games are decided by control: you improve your worst piece, stop their ideas, make a small threat, then another, until your opponent can’t breathe. This post shows a calm, repeatable way to turn “slightly better” into “completely winning.” Use this as a thinking routine. Before every move, ask: Does this make my position safer, stronger, or more flexible—and does it make theirs worse? If the answer is yes, you’re converting.

Last time, I didn’t notice the errors AI made in the thumbnail. But today, I generated this one especially to mess with you guys. I never thought a photo would cause so much drama or be taken that seriously — ease up and take it lightly :)
But enough about that let's get to the real chess.

What counts as an “advantage”?

  • You’re a little better developed.
  • You control an open file or an outpost square.
  • Their king is less safe.
  • Their pawn structure has a small weakness (isolated, doubled, backward).
  • Your pieces are more active/useful.

You don’t need to “do something dramatic.” You need to reduce their options while improving yours.


First, switch off their counterplay

Before trying to win, you have to cut the wires on their ideas. Guard your king, cover potential pawn breaks, and remove any cheap tactics they might have. This example comes from a game played by my strong and hardworking student, Gerard—one of my favorites. Gerard is the most imaginative player I've trained; his games are often graced by a brilliant move or a moment of true magic. He was playing White and already had a clear advantage. However, to maintain it, he needed to resist the temptation of capturing a specific pawn. Let's see how he handled the position.

https://lichess.org/study/Mj4MmQsx/7nH7GwS3#0


Improve the worst piece first

The quickest way to increase pressure without taking undue risk is to scan the board and ask: "Which of my pieces is doing the least?" Your task is to fix that piece, repeating the process until all your forces are active. This means finding a way to reroute a passive knight to a dominating outpost, lifting a rook to an open file (or doubling them up), or finding a new, active diagonal for a bad bishop. Every incremental improvement compounds the advantage.

https://lichess.org/study/Mj4MmQsx/gnKlyOJA#34


Fix a target and make it stay weak

Converting an advantage requires establishing sustained pressure by focusing on one key target. You must identify or create one pawn or square that your opponent is forced to defend indefinitely. This involves either provoking a weakness (like provoking f6 to create a hole on g6 ) or ensuring a strategic asset you already possess, such as control of an open file or a dominating outpost. The goal is not just to attack, but to establish a stable, fixed vulnerability. By pinning, blocking, or maneuvering, you commit their army to defense, which frees up your own pieces for action elsewhere.

https://lichess.org/study/Mj4MmQsx/fYlUYWCS#0

If you caught the idea of this example, congratulations! The point is that White first made sure to fix the weakness—or rather, the strength he had—on the file. Once that is secured, using it with the rooks or the queen becomes much easier. Now, imagine if White had gone the other way around, starting with Re3

https://lichess.org/study/Mj4MmQsx/ITmiHoF2#1

So, now you can stop wondering where the advantage goes in your games—it doesn’t magically disappear!


Create a second weakness

One weakness can be defended. Two weaknesses split their army in half. Once the first target is fixed, quietly open a new front on the other side of the board.

https://lichess.org/study/Mj4MmQsx/SU6ZRiln#68


Open lines only when they favor you

Don’t open the position for both sides. Open it when your pieces will land on the open squares first.

https://lichess.org/study/Mj4MmQsx/IoGF9tfc#2


Steer into a known winning endgame

If you know a certain endgame is winning , aim for it. Your middlegame choices should guide the game toward that table you know how to win
I’d like to share another game from one of my students, Alessandro. I've been teaching him for only a month, but he’s already putting in a huge effort that’s paying off. He often spends over an hour sometimes even two on each puzzle I assign, and I genuinely appreciate the dedication and effort he puts in.
When Alessandro sends me a game, he first annotates it thoroughly, then runs the engine, and then adds even more notes. What I really admire is that he never deletes his mistakes, he just adds comments! This makes reviewing his games enjoyable and incredibly helpful for tailoring his training. Alessandro, thank you for your dedication!
Although I won’t share his raw notes since I haven’t asked for his permission, I could easily write an entire blog about Alessandro’s work ethic.

In this game, Alessandro was playing with Black. He was completely winning and had several strong continuations. He mentioned that he sensed a tactical opportunity in the position but couldn’t quite pinpoint it, so after spending about 30 minutes searching for the best continuation, he chose a different — yet still winning — path, which was a very smart decision.

https://lichess.org/study/Mj4MmQsx/XjBLg8cE#61


Conclusion

When holding an advantage, precision and patience matter most. Fix one weakness and only then create a second — two weaknesses are far harder to defend than one. Neutralize your opponent’s counterplay, then improve your worst pieces. Open the position only when it benefits your own pieces, trade pieces that help you, and keep pawns that restrict the opponent.
Converting an edge isn’t about finding a trick; it’s about steady improvement. If each move strengthens your position or limits theirs, the advantage will convert itself , your opponent won’t collapse suddenly, they’ll simply run out of moves.